WIPO Cases | UDRP Cases - 2025
Many companies attempt to acquire valuable domain names through the UDRP (Uniform Domain-Name Dispute-Resolution Policy) process rather than securing them through negotiation. However, when a complainant loses a UDRP case, their efforts not only fail, but they also publicly reveal their interest in the domain—potentially increasing its value and making future negotiations more challenging. Instead of taking this risky approach, these companies should have worked with an experienced domain broker like Gerard Michael of DNPost.com, who specializes in acquiring domains efficiently and discreetly. Now that their UDRP attempt has failed, their next step is clear: they will need a skilled broker to negotiate on their behalf and secure the domain they originally sought through litigation. The reality is that UDRP losses don't mean the game is over—they just mean it's time to call a professional.
WIPO Case Number | D2025-0756 |
Domain name(s) | |
Complainant | Knowledge Systems |
WIPO Case Number | D2025-0763 |
Domain name(s) | |
Complainant | Archer-Daniels-Midland Company |
WIPO Case Number | D2025-0784 |
Domain name(s) | |
Complainant | Cosmetic Research Group |
WIPO Case Number | D2025-0430 |
Domain name(s) | |
Complainant | CASSY SAS |
WIPO Case Number | D2025-0500 |
Domain name(s) | |
Complainant | Gong Galaxy |
WIPO Case Number | D2025-0568 |
Domain name(s) | |
Complainant | TomoCredit, Inc. |