top of page

WIPO Cases | UDRP Cases - 2024

Writer: DNPostDNPost

Companies seeking to acquire a domain name through the WIPO - UDRP (Uniform Domain-Name Dispute-Resolution Policy) process often do so as a legal strategy to claim rights over a domain they believe infringes on their trademark. However, when a complainant is unsuccessful, the proceedings not only establish that they do not have an automatic right to the domain, but also publicly disclose their interest in acquiring it—potentially influencing its market value.


At this stage, their legal recourse may be limited, leaving negotiation as the primary path forward. Engaging an experienced domain broker, such as Gerard Michael of DNPost.com, would have been a prudent course of action from the outset, allowing for a confidential and strategic acquisition. Now that the UDRP process has concluded in the respondent’s favor, these companies must consider working with a professional domain broker to facilitate a legitimate purchase, ensuring compliance with domain acquisition best practices while avoiding further legal and strategic missteps.


 

WIPO Case Number

D2024-0666

Domain name(s)

Complainant

Waterland Private Equity Investments B.V.

Respondent

Emerson Alvarado


Paytotake, LLC

Panelist

Buydens, Mireille


Isenberg, Douglas M.


Kennedy, Matthew (Presiding)

Decision Date

25-04-2024

Decision

WIPO Case Number

D2024-0778

Domain name(s)

Complainant

Trix Investimentos Ltda


Trx investimentos e participações ltda.

Respondent

Steve Haehnichen, Recreational U-Turns and Falconry

Panelist

Alexiev, Assen

Decision Date

03-04-2024

Decision

WIPO Case Number

D2024-0867

Domain name(s)

Complainant

HK America Inc.

Decision

Terminated

Domain name(s)

Complainant

Bamboo Capital Partners

Decision

Terminated

WIPO Case Number

D2024-2312

Domain name(s)

Complainant

Westrock Shared Services, LLC

Decision

Terminated

WIPO Case Number

D2024-2935

Domain name(s)

Complainant

McMahon Distributeur Pharmaceutique inc.

Respondent

Eric Grant, Contrast Technologies, Inc.

Panelist

Bernstein, David H.


Campello Estebaranz, Reyes


Kennedy, Matthew (Presiding)

Decision Date

22-10-2024

Decision

WIPO Case Number

D2024-3871

Domain name(s)

Complainant

A. AUGIS


ARTHUS BERTRAND

Respondent

Mira Holdings, Mira Holdings

Panelist

Gardner, Nick J.

Decision Date

07-11-2024

Decision


bottom of page